Higher Secondary School due to administrative reasons and it was not equivalent to the removal of respondent No. Dev Nagari Pathshala Primary School to S.D. 1 has no subsisting cause of action against the Appellant and that the respondent No. ![]() Higher Secondary School which is under the control of the Directorate of Education, Delhi Administration and as such Respondent No. The Appellant filed a reply wherein it was stated on record that the Respondent No. The said suit was was dismissed on 29th February, 1980 on the grounds that it was not maintainable.Į. 570 of 1978 in the Court of the Senior Sub-Judge, Delhi challenging his transfer to S.D. ![]() On 11th December, 1978, the Respondent No. 1 was assured by the management and the concerned authorities that he would not be deprived of any benefits which accrue to him in the primary school.ĭ. 1 made repeated representations without any response in writing to the concerned authorities on 20th October, 1968, 27th January 1969, 10th September 1970, 26th July 1971, 6th July 1972, 1st January 1973, 25th February 1978, 26th February 1978, 2nd March 1978, 3rd March 1978, 5th August 1978 and 20th August 1979. Aggrieved by the order of his transfer to Middle School, the Respondent No. Both the primary and middle schools were under the management of Sanatan Dharm Sabha.Ĭ. Gaur was appointed to the Selection Grade Post with effect from 13th February, 1978 which was approved by the Director of Education. Higher Secondary School) without his consent. Dev Nagari Pathshala Middle School (now called S.D. On 17th September, 1968, the Respondent No. He was confirmed in the same school and held a lien on this post.ī. Sanatan Dharm Sabha at a pay scale of Rs. Dev Nagari Pathshala, a primary school, aided by the MCD and owned by Messrs. 1, Shri Deen Dayal Sharma was appointed Assistant Teacher in S.D. The brief facts of the case are as follows:Ī. 1, who was an Assistant Teacher in a school aided by the MCD.Ģ. 442 of 1980 by which judgment the writ petition was allowed in favor of the Respondent No. The Appellant, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has filed the present Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 4th December, 2001 passed in W.P. (iii) holding degree in law from a recognized university.Īddress where Application is to be sent: Candidate must ensure to fill in their applications and send it to the Principal Registrar (I/C), Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, West Blick-VII, Sector-I, RK Puram, New Delhi-110066 along with the relevant documents.įor more details related to eligibility criteria, fee, pattern, annexures, place of posting etc. ![]() (ii) five years regular service in the parent cadre or Department in Level-12 of the Pay matrix (i) holding analogous post on regular basis in the parent cadre or Department Armed Forces Tribunal invites applications for the following posts via Deputation:Įssential Qualification: Officers of Central Government or state Government or Supreme Court or High courts or District Courts or Statutory/Autonomous bodies having persionary benefits or judge Advocate General Branch of Army Navy & Air Force and other similar institutions:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |